Thanks again Peter for your reply (and today's PR). I appreciate your explanation of inspecting working units rather than the manufacturing process. That makes sense. It also makes sense you don't want to comment on politics.

The point I was trying to make regarding DI is that I interpret your PR's of Apt 29 & Jun 3 as indicating PYR bid on and was awarded the Drosrite contract before DI was in the picture. I'm trying to understand why PYR would involve another company in an already awarded contract when they don't do any manufacturing as you pointed out. I assume they will participate in the profit rather than it all going to PYR. When I researched Drosrite International I couldn't find any record of this company before last July and after the contract was awarded to PYR. This is the major source of my confusion and I believe a reasonable one for shareholders. Thank you in advance. Regards.