"Not sure I understand that."

That was rather convoluted....lol.

What I meant to convey was that, if slight dilution means eVU sales can move forward to meet customer needs and time frames, then that dilution will prove to be constructive and beneficial to shareholders.

 And ultimately, if EDIG can retire debt as a result of revenue growth that comes as a result of this new access to capital, the company will be much healthier, and subsequently, shareholders wealthier.

Would investors rather own a larger percentage of a losing balance sheet or a slightly smaller piece of a profitable balance sheet?