Free
Message: Re: LL, personal inquirery??/Wolfy
7
Apr 16, 2008 05:20PM
1
Apr 17, 2008 04:31AM
4
Apr 17, 2008 04:59AM

Apr 17, 2008 05:17AM

Apr 17, 2008 05:37AM

I think you are being too "realistic". A brother in soul with LL.

Perhaps I am being too simplistic but the fact that DM took this case on "CONTINGENCY" says it all. This type of firm would not take a case like this if they did not feel their chances of prevailing was far more than 50-50. That being so, I do not believe DM would be anywhere near EDig if they calculated their "profit" to be 40-50% of a ten million dollar settlement.

Putting the time, energy and resources into this for $5,000,00 as its share of a settlement and then have to pay taxes (maybe) on it would definitely NOT be a goal of DM.

If your thought process prevailed DM WOULD NOT BE HERE.

Can you imagine the conversation in the boardroom....."OK guys, we have a pretty good case here, let go and "DO IT". "Lets put in those long hours, months, years of work, pay ourselves out of our own funds and all the legal costs involved and we could possible get a settlement out of one or two of those infringers of $10 maybe $20 million which would mean we can get $8,000,000, just enough to cover our costs"... YEAH MAN, LETS GO......

N O T


Apr 17, 2008 07:32AM

Apr 17, 2008 08:10AM

Apr 17, 2008 08:19AM

Apr 17, 2008 08:37AM
1
Apr 17, 2008 09:05AM
1
Apr 17, 2008 09:31AM

Apr 17, 2008 09:35AM
1
Apr 17, 2008 10:50AM
1
Apr 17, 2008 11:24AM
6
Apr 20, 2008 06:00PM

Apr 20, 2008 06:08PM

Apr 20, 2008 06:11PM

Apr 20, 2008 06:11PM
1
Apr 20, 2008 08:36PM
1
Apr 21, 2008 04:36AM
1
Apr 21, 2008 04:59AM

Apr 21, 2008 06:02AM
4
Apr 21, 2008 06:03AM
1
Apr 21, 2008 06:23AM
3
Apr 21, 2008 08:28AM

Apr 21, 2008 03:57PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply