I am not adverse to a trial by jury for the points you make but I just find it implausible that they would prefer to go the distance with so many infringers being on the list. Certainly that is where this will go if they do not settle and so be it, as the outcome could be much larger for us.

As a shareholder I'd rather see some early settlements for obvious reasons. With some money in the bank then they can decide who it is they want to play hardball with and who they do not.

And there is the risk if EDIG loses too....so if they make a strong enough case then they can likely find some middle ground that generates substantial revenue to EDIG and DM, eliminating our risk of a complete wash out...considering they have a fiduciary duty to maximize shareholder value and I would think they get some early settlements to stabilize operations and then play hardball with the bigger fish.

RP stated there was a strategy to the filing order and that he would one day share that with us....

Suffice it to say some will settle and some will go to trial by jury, with a group this large.