Re: Pacer
in response to
by
posted on
Oct 08, 2008 07:39PM
Wow, looking at an earlier decision the Utah Court made makes me think it could be months before the Court rules on EDIG's motion for summary judgment in Doc 214.
The Court took 4 months to rule on Motion 34 which was a motion by EDIG for another summary judgment as to the Scope of Exclusivity Under the DRM Agreement. That's the one we kicked BOW's arse on. LOL