Because at this point, with regard to one time fees combined with X-licensing of the entire portfolio, makes no sense to me, very short gains.

IMO, the only way this should or would be acceptable to investors, is if the x-licensing for e.Digitals tech is specific to A product, i.e...voice recorders. It can't be an open range consideration to any and all products current and future.

With that, if either go beyond the scope of the X-license, they pursue a legal remedy.

If you note in the recent Casio pr, e.Digital is held to a current line of products in using Casio IP.....is that consideration a limited reciprocal?

They're not saying, however, I can't believe it wouldn't be.

doni