Free
Message: Re: PACER Samsung-trillium/ You Are So Confused ??? I'm not Surprised
20
May 29, 2009 03:36PM

May 29, 2009 04:15PM
2
May 29, 2009 07:16PM
1
May 29, 2009 07:22PM
1
May 29, 2009 07:29PM
1
May 30, 2009 03:41AM
12
May 30, 2009 11:03AM
4
May 30, 2009 11:11AM
10
May 30, 2009 08:05PM
4
May 30, 2009 08:16PM
6
May 31, 2009 02:21AM
4
May 31, 2009 07:44AM

DEAN:...

You are right in saying, "I think Apple is the home run, but we shall see."...

I recall reading that APPLE has a $12 Billion WAR CHEST!...

1) WHY DO YOU SUPPOSE THAT IS THE CASE?...

2) DIDN'T APPLE START WITH CHIPS/MOTHER BOARDS, SUPPLIED BY PORTAL PLAYER, (A CLOSE "PARNETR") OF EDIG, FOR A LONG TIME AT THE START OF ITS CREATING ITS IPOD MIRACLE PRODUCT?...

3) DIDN'T APPLE LIST EDIG AS "PRIOR ART" IN APPLYING FOR ITS OWN PATENTS?...

Apple may not be "The Home Run" kid. But, you can be sure it is one of the HIGH HANGING FAT CAT FRUITS, and they are ready...

Given DM'S stated emphasis on "Settlements", (look at their site saying so), it makes great sense to work out a "DEAL" with SAMSUNG "In This Law Suit", so as to have sufficient funds to go all the way to U.S SUPREME COURT with APPLE...

This is about "MAKING", or "CHANGING" the LAW. And DM knows about that aspect of their cases well. They made the "MARKMAN" decision, and now they are looking forward to plug a hole in the IP litigation which is based on a Court of Appeal Decision which gives a "PASS" to an alleged infringer if he can show that his alleged infringement occurred through the use of second party products, (Portal Player Chips/Boards), which were put in the commerce with the knowledge and permission of the plaintiff...

EDIG'S case offeres a good set of facts for overturning that Appellate Decision, and DM knows it...

Gil...









7
May 31, 2009 02:48PM
9
Jun 01, 2009 04:56AM

Jun 01, 2009 05:04AM
5
Jun 01, 2009 06:07AM
1
Jun 01, 2009 06:59AM
3
Jun 01, 2009 07:05AM
5
Jun 01, 2009 07:36AM
3
Jun 01, 2009 07:50AM
8
Jun 01, 2009 08:11AM
1
Jun 01, 2009 08:19AM
1
Jun 01, 2009 08:30AM
4
Jun 01, 2009 08:47AM
3
Jun 01, 2009 08:52AM
2
Jun 01, 2009 09:31AM
7
Jun 02, 2009 08:08AM
1
Jun 02, 2009 08:17AM
5
Jun 02, 2009 08:22AM

Jun 02, 2009 08:23AM
2
Jun 02, 2009 08:35AM
3
Jun 02, 2009 08:39AM

Jun 02, 2009 08:44AM
1
Jun 02, 2009 08:50AM

Jun 02, 2009 09:28AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply