Re: PACER Samsung / Dischino
in response to
by
posted on
Jun 01, 2009 07:36AM
"Samsung is a big fish no doubt it......if it's decided to settle for fixed amounts while round filing 445 and 108 in the process.....at some point dilution of the tech will happen as it's utilized by the defendants."
One more time and I'm done with 445 and 108 commentary....
445 and 108 are dropped form the Samsung case...."with prejudice" we cannot haunt Samsung, or any other of it's owned entities over this issue for any future IP infringement..... case closed.
We, in essence, gave them, along with all related owned entities, the use of ideas.....where, IMO, we do not fork over the code at this level....perhaps at some point they will sell 445 and 108.
IMO, they do not have to wait for the formal closure of the case to implement, the only thing that blocks the use of the ideas are the methods of processor and console interface.
They're giving the the cart before the horse so to speak....IMO, without the source code.
doni