Free
Message: Re: PACER Samsung --- richardo
21
Jun 20, 2009 12:49AM

Jun 20, 2009 01:43AM
4
Jun 20, 2009 10:36AM
3
Jun 20, 2009 10:38AM
10
Jun 20, 2009 11:29AM
5
Jun 20, 2009 11:46AM
2
Jun 20, 2009 12:03PM
10
Jun 20, 2009 12:54PM
6
Jun 20, 2009 01:04PM
2
Jun 20, 2009 01:32PM
10
Jun 20, 2009 02:21PM
1
Jun 20, 2009 02:57PM
2
Jun 20, 2009 03:15PM

Jun 20, 2009 04:28PM

richardo, I was under the impression there is only one Markman Hearing related to a specific patent or patents. Are you saying we could win the Markman in February against Samsung and somewhere down the line have to go through another Markman against a new defendant? Do you know if PTSC has had multiple Markmans? LL/Gil, help us out here. And can a Markman ruling be appealed?

In my mind, we have attained solid patent validation by the fact that 6 defendants have settled out of court, albeit small settlements. Like someone else posted, it's possible DM may have asked much more in settlement money from Samsung which is why they've decided to proceed to Markman. Otherwise, I'd think they'd pay the $2M - $3M and be done with us. However early settlement validation of our IP is nowhere near as powerful as a federal judge validating our patents. I'd call that a VERY positive validation.

Going to take a much needed nap. zzzzzzzzzzzzz

1
Jun 21, 2009 10:09AM

Jun 21, 2009 11:10AM

Jun 21, 2009 11:13AM
3
Moo
Jun 21, 2009 12:03PM
14
Jun 21, 2009 05:44PM
9
Jun 21, 2009 08:12PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply