Agoracom: Small Cap Investment - e.Digital - Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS

Reply New Message

Back To Forum List View

Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list

DABOSS

Jul 29, 2009 12:43PM

Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS

Minister

Jul 29, 2009 01:04PM

Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS

DABOSS

Jul 29, 2009 01:43PM

Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS

phoenix7

Jul 29, 2009 02:25PM

Minister

Rank: Vice President [?]

Points: 20147 [?]

Votes: 110 Score: 3.1 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS

in response to

Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS

phoenix7

posted on Jul 29, 2009 03:00PM

Phoenix7...

As I said in my lasy post on the subject...

"With a Big Verdict against Samsung, and a positive Markman Ruling in Hand all DM has to do send out letters of "DEMAND" telling those mentioned "HOW MUCH" he wants TO SETTLE. For such is the effect of a Positive Markman Ruling...

I say NO WAY to a $25-50 SETTLEMENT with Samsung"...

Thus we agree that Markman Rulin in favor od EDIG is worth much, much more to the overal PLAN of DM to monetize EDIG patents than a measly $25-50 million...

Gil...

5 Recommendations

Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS

Minister

Jul 29, 2009 03:00PM

Re: SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list - Minister/Phoenix

DickPick

Jul 29, 2009 03:09PM

Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS

phoenix7

Jul 29, 2009 03:12PM

Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS-Gil