Agoracom: Small Cap Investment - e.Digital - Re: Nasdaq - PTSC Not Apples to Apples

Logo2

Free

Reply New Message

Back To Forum List View

Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list

2

Jul 29, 2009 12:43PM

Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS

10

Jul 29, 2009 01:04PM

Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS

3

Jul 29, 2009 01:43PM

Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS

4

Jul 29, 2009 02:25PM

Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS

5

Jul 29, 2009 03:00PM

Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS

2

Jul 29, 2009 03:00PM

Re: SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list - Minister/Phoenix

3

Jul 29, 2009 03:09PM

Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS

2

Jul 29, 2009 03:12PM

Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS-Gil

3

Jul 29, 2009 04:22PM

Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS-Gil

2

Jul 29, 2009 04:38PM

Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS-Gil

3

Jul 29, 2009 04:45PM

Re: Since SAMSUNG is not the only Fat Cat infringer on the list/ DABOSS-Gil

4

Jul 29, 2009 05:16PM

4

Jul 29, 2009 06:17PM

wanabe

wanabe

Rank: Treasurer [?]

Points: 1257 [?]

Votes: 65 Score: 2.5 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: Nasdaq - PTSC Not Apples to Apples

posted on Jul 29, 2009 06:36PM

Totally different comparison. Not apples and apples. PTSC gave dividends with a huge chunk of the money. PTSC got rid of mega warrants / debt with that money. PTSC has been buying back shares with that money and not removing them from market.

PTSC would be in a totally different position today had they not done the divy's nor had the huge warrants to buy back.

JMHO

4 Recommendations

Loading...

Loading...

Re: Nasdaq - PTSC

5

Jul 29, 2009 06:52PM

Re: Nasdaq - PTSC

2

Jul 29, 2009 07:02PM

Re: Nasdaq - PTSC...SKY56...

1

Jul 29, 2009 07:48PM

CLOSING ARGUMENTS

12

Jul 29, 2009 08:48PM

Re: Nasdaq - PTSC

Jul 29, 2009 09:08PM

Re: CLOSING ARGUMENTS

1

Jul 29, 2009 09:25PM

Re: CLOSING ARGUMENTS

3

Jul 29, 2009 10:06PM

Revenue generation through patent lawsuits is the new trend !!!

5

Jul 29, 2009 10:25PM

Re: Revenue generation through patent lawsuits is the new trend !!!

3

Jul 29, 2009 11:10PM

Re: Nasdaq-LL...DB like always you changed the wording

3

Jul 29, 2009 11:42PM

Re: Revenue generation through patent lawsuits is the new trend !!!

8

Jul 30, 2009 01:57AM

Re: Revenue generation through patent lawsuits is the new trend !!!

4

Jul 30, 2009 01:59AM

Re: Nasdaq-LL...DB like always you changed the wording

8

Jul 30, 2009 02:08AM

Re: Nasdaq-LL...DB like always you changed the wording

7

Jul 30, 2009 02:11AM

Re: Revenue generation through patent lawsuits is the new trend !!!

9

Jul 30, 2009 08:00AM

Re: Nasdaq-LL...DB like always you changed the wording

3

Jul 30, 2009 08:23AM

Re: CLOSING ARGUMENTS

Jul 30, 2009 01:03PM

Reply New Message

Back To Forum List View

Share

Share

Share

Please to post a reply