Free
Message: Re: PACER Samsung -- Doc 172 -- murgirl
9
Aug 06, 2009 08:28PM
7
Aug 06, 2009 08:38PM
12
Aug 06, 2009 08:42PM
3
Aug 06, 2009 09:30PM
1
Aug 06, 2009 09:42PM
3
Aug 06, 2009 09:43PM
2
Aug 06, 2009 09:47PM
2
Aug 06, 2009 10:49PM

murgirl, that quote is a reply from Samsung in Doc 139; it is not from EDIG or the court. Samsung is saying that 76 of the 136 products EDIG has accused don't qualify because of point of sale issues. The court has not ruled on this so we could still have all 136 products considered in our lawsuit.

Regards,

Mike

20
Aug 07, 2009 12:41AM
3
Aug 07, 2009 09:11AM
4
Aug 07, 2009 09:14AM
2
Aug 07, 2009 10:13AM
2
Aug 07, 2009 11:20AM
3
Aug 07, 2009 11:32AM
2
Aug 07, 2009 12:39PM
3
Aug 07, 2009 12:58PM
2
Aug 07, 2009 01:22PM
4
Aug 07, 2009 02:02PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply