Free
Message: Re: PACER --murgirl SS
14
Feb 12, 2010 12:24PM
3
Feb 12, 2010 12:31PM
6
Feb 12, 2010 12:36PM
3
Feb 12, 2010 12:40PM
11
Feb 12, 2010 12:42PM
5
Feb 12, 2010 12:46PM
2
Feb 12, 2010 12:47PM

Feb 12, 2010 02:11PM
2
Feb 12, 2010 02:15PM
4
Feb 12, 2010 03:31PM
14
Feb 12, 2010 04:16PM

Feb 12, 2010 04:22PM
2
Feb 12, 2010 04:38PM
3
Feb 12, 2010 05:18PM
3
Feb 12, 2010 06:02PM
2
Feb 12, 2010 09:26PM
8
Feb 12, 2010 10:52PM
18
Feb 13, 2010 01:17PM
4
Feb 13, 2010 05:23PM
2
Feb 13, 2010 07:26PM
2
Feb 15, 2010 04:16AM

With my recent track record, I will no longer post of settlements that I think have been reached, and certainly not chance percentages a settlement has been reached, between any parties. EXCEPTION:The PACER filing clearly states in black & white that a settlement has been reached.

Your joint dismissal argument doesn’t hold water because the TIC Computer dismissal (Doc 09) wasn’t a joint motion. However, the TIC Computer dismissal does have different language from the other four dismissal filings. There is no mention of each party bearing its own costs and attorneys’ fees in the other four filings.

-----

(Doc 09)PLAINTIFF E.DIGITAL CORPORATION’S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF TIC COMPUTER, INC.

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation (“e.Digital”) dismisses
without prejudice all of its claims against TIC Computer, Inc. in the above-referenced action. E.Digital and TIC Computer, Inc. have agreed that each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

-----

(Doc 150)PLAINTIFF E.DIGITAL CORPORATION’S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF SUMMIT GLOBAL GROUP, LLC

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation (“e.Digital”) dismisses without prejudice all of its claims against Summit Global Group, LLC in the above-referenced action.

-----

(Doc 165)PLAINTIFF E.DIGITAL CORPORATION’S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF DXG TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation (“e.Digital”) dismisses without prejudice all of its claims against DXG TECHNOLOGY, INC. in the above-referenced action.

-----

(Doc 166)PLAINTIFF E.DIGITAL CORPORATION’S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF LEICA CAMERA AG

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation (“e.Digital”) dismisses without prejudice all of its claims against LEICA CAMERA AG in the above-referenced action.

-----

(Doc 176) PLAINTIFF E.DIGITAL CORPORATION’S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF KYOCERA WIRELESS, INC.

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation (“e.Digital”) dismisses without prejudice all of its claims against KYOCERA WIRELESS, INC. in the above-referenced action.

5
Feb 15, 2010 02:34PM
7
Feb 15, 2010 04:15PM
3
Feb 15, 2010 04:25PM
1
Feb 15, 2010 05:04PM
5
Feb 15, 2010 07:49PM
3
Feb 15, 2010 10:17PM
2
Feb 16, 2010 08:09AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply