Re: PACER --murgirl
in response to
by
posted on
Feb 13, 2010 01:17PM
Thanks for the Pacer info. I see that you have already figured out that they did not settle ..took time to compile the following (without a Pacer account :-) but worth the read. I think we will know when there is indeed a settlement. BTW..this means DGX and Leica did not settle too.
------------
I disagree with your statement of fact that Leica did not settle. Truth is we don't know. Here's what we do know as FACTS regarding the dismissals to date:
Additionally, we know that Ikegami Electronics (U.S.A.), Inc, Roland Systems Group U.S., and Roland Corp haven't been dismissed yet but have settled with EDIG. We know this because I heard Mr. Jameson tell the judge and there is a reference to the settlements in Doc 144. It is unclear why they haven't been dismissed yet but it could just be DM is dotting the i's and crossing the t's in the settlement agreements. Or there could be a grander strategy planned by EDIG to announce a barrage of settlements in a coordinated effort to get some market attention.