Re: Pacer...Silver
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 11, 2010 11:58AM
I don't know....they were not initially in the Featherstone list looking for the Feb 19th extension....perhaps they are now part of the "amended complaint' extension...3-26-10...by default.
In any event, I'm still baffled of where the 3-26-10 date is made. You noted to me the other day doc 187....which is not aviable to read, however, it looks as though it could be the item proposing a date.
02/19/2010 |
NOTICE of Consent to Amend Complaint and Stipulation Pursuant to Local Rule 6.1A of Extension of Time to Respond to Amended Complaint by Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation (Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 02/19/2010) |
I do not see a subsequent court order pacer acknowledging 187...
doni