doni,

Doc 187 has been on box.net for awhile now and paragraph 2 shows 3/26/10 as a due date. I guess because DM cited Local Rule 6.1(A) regarding a 21 day extension, and didn't request a due date of 3/26/10, the court didn't need to write an order.

----------

2. Further, e.Digital has stipulated, pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(A) to a 21 day
extension of time until March 26, 2010 for Defendants PENTAX OF AMERICA, INC.; HOYA
CORPORATION; HOYA CORPORATION USA; CANON USA, INC.; COBY
ELECTRONICS CORP.; DXG TECHNOLOGY (U.S.A.), INC.; HTC AMERICA, INC.;
KYOCERA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; KYOCERA INTERNATIONAL, INC.; KYOCERA
CORPORATION; KYOCERA WIRELESS CORPORATION; LEICA CAMERA, INC.;
MARANTZ AMERICA, INC.; D&M HOLDINGS U.S. INC.; NOKIA, INC.; NOKIA
CORPORATION; PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA; PANASONIC
CORPORATION; SAMSON TECHNOLOGIES CORP.; TEAC AMERICA, INC. and VTECH
ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA, LLC to respond to the Amended Complaint, due to the
fact that e.Digital has added a claim for infringement of a second patent.