Re: defendants claim construct...
in response to
by
posted on
Jun 17, 2010 09:45AM
"During prosecution the Applicants distinguished their claims over the prior art by arguing that the flash memory in their hand-held dictation device was the “sole memory” in the device, without another memory system such as RAM. "
Defendants need to go back and read the patents.....there is a static high speed caching process.
They emulate they do not eliminate....
doni