Re: AGORA Rule # 5-nose
in response to
by
posted on
May 14, 2011 09:18AM
nose,
The "elements" are tied to the Markman hearing, whose results we await, not as a result of EDIG management's past history on other fronts, but rather a slow legal system.
The direction management has taken since 2007, when they began the monetization process of their FLASH patent portfolio, is what this investment is all about today.
The "elements" also exist in the form of the new EDIG Innovations group, which was officially addressed in the company's recent conference call and which is slated for a summer 2011 release, per the company and its consultant.
They are the reasons you hold this investment, as opposed to events that occurred 7+ years ago that some seem fixated on and who continue to try and paint this investment in a negative light.
Past events may have played into the current .099 pps but have absolutely nothing to do with the trajectory of this investment should the courts support EDIG's key patents.
And I would hardly characterize Duane Morris LLP defending EDIG's Flash Patent Portfolio in a Markman hearing as "hype". It is a real event that holds major implications for this investment should the judge yield a postive ruling. As for Nunchi/Nunally and the "new technologies", that remains to be seen. Again, I see no "hype" or projections for a revenue stream with Nunchi yet as not enough information has surfaced one way or the other.
EDIG is a speculative investment, a rags to riches play should they deliver on the course they are traveling. To own this investment knowing that, then fixate on regurgitating negatives from a decade ago is nothing more than a counter productive effort and irrelevant, and likely more about personalities than investment opportunity.
DB