"I also consider the comments of its(courts) lack of intellect on the subject matter, and its (courts)dis-positive comments relating to, " How can a judge have five months to rule on two aspects and then "rule" on only one part of one part?", as you put it, .....to be unprofessional(court).

Because what you state is dead on, this patent can not be opinionated under a one half condition of one claim term only."

As to answering your most on point question....I have no idea why the court did as it did....in honing in on one issue while avoiding the other.

737 should fill the gap....but why the court did not want to consolidate both issues on 774 is beyond me.....digital issues are definitely spelled out in 774....and it was aware that 737 was in play???

doni