Re: PACER
in response to
by
posted on
Oct 20, 2011 12:22PM
Yes, and like settlement #14, which did not want a PR, ditto.
Fred fielded a few emails re: #14 on this topic, and with me at my 8/24 visit, because there was a #13 settlement PR, a #15 ditto, so many thought there was an error, but it was intentional.
He said, "at the request of the defendant, we did not issue a PR."
Bottom line though, we don't know what was agreed to for Kyocera and Samson?