Free
Message: Re: PACER.....Gil
15
Oct 19, 2011 06:32PM
13
Oct 19, 2011 06:34PM
3
Oct 19, 2011 06:41PM
6
Oct 19, 2011 07:03PM
10
Oct 19, 2011 07:04PM
3
Oct 20, 2011 08:02AM
10
Oct 20, 2011 08:29AM
5
Oct 20, 2011 08:57AM
6
Oct 20, 2011 09:09AM
6
Oct 20, 2011 09:36AM
2
Oct 20, 2011 09:41AM
5
Oct 20, 2011 09:50AM
7
Oct 20, 2011 10:58AM
3
Oct 20, 2011 12:15PM
7
Oct 20, 2011 12:22PM
11
Oct 20, 2011 01:33PM
6
Oct 20, 2011 01:49PM
6
Oct 20, 2011 06:50PM
4
Oct 20, 2011 07:02PM
4
Oct 20, 2011 07:07PM
11
Oct 20, 2011 09:12PM

Oct 20, 2011 09:29PM
8
Oct 20, 2011 11:34PM

"You are confusing yourself by calling documents filed by the parties a "statement"."

"Nor they write "statements" with no objective in mind."

Then why does PACER document 398 read, "STATEMENT" and "Joint Statement" in the title?

07/28/2011

398

STATEMENT re 395 Order [Joint Statement In Response to June 28, 2011 Order Regarding Claim Construction] by Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Yungwirth, Matthew) (Entered: 07/28/2011)

11
Oct 21, 2011 08:13AM
4
Oct 21, 2011 09:07AM
1
Oct 21, 2011 10:16AM
6
Oct 21, 2011 01:52PM
3
Oct 21, 2011 01:57PM
1
Oct 21, 2011 01:59PM
1
Oct 21, 2011 03:35PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply