"but will the USPO examiner determine that those skilled in the art should understand that pert-near the same thing must occure within the Sharp patent to achieve basicaly the same result... even if not described"

RE: 774

"Overall system design is based on the use of a microprocessor which can drive all system components. This eliminates the need for use of multiple interface logic that demands a lot of board space within the circuitry."

Which method form above is used in the obscured Sharp publication?

e.Digitals is detailed, can they simply answer ?...."we considered it the same way e.Digital does and we did it first, because we ventured a generalization" does this give them the right to re establish there initial consideration with more detail if e.Digital fails the test?

It's not about " basicaly the same result" as results should be the same, however, done differently with explinations.

"This eliminates the need for use of multiple interface logic that demands a lot of board space within the circuitry."

I would venture to say that there are countless interface methods patented around that phrase, all requiring a power supply....and e.Digital does it differently.

doni