Re: Today's Black Suited Bash, I made a mistake,,,,,,,,SMAN
in response to
by
posted on
Jul 28, 2013 03:44PM
Frank, see doc 35, e.Digitals responce to JVC's CE motion...page 26. "E. Alternatively, E.Digital Proposes That The Court Postpone Decision On The Motion Until After Completion Of Markman
To the extent the Court is inclined to grant the Motion, e.Digital requests that the Court postpone a final ruling until after completion of claim construction proceedings. Inquiry into whether two claims are identical after reexamination should not occur until after formal claim construction.
See, e.g., Sorensen v.
Emerson Elec. Co . , 2011 WL 6752559, at*5-7 (S.D.Cal. Dec. 22, 2011) (holding
that “[t]he process for determining whether there is a substantive change between the pre- and post-reexamination versions of a patent claim requires the Court to perform the same type of analysis as when resolving a typical claim construction dispute” and, so consequently, the Court should wait to determine the proper construction of claims at issue in the pre- and post-reexamination context until after the benefit of full claim construction proceedings);
Etagz, Inc. v. Quiksilver,
Inc. 2012 WL 2135497 (C.D. 2012) at *2.
It would be unjust and unduly prejudicial to grant this Motion prior to the parties being able to conduct discovery or before the Court conducts a claim construction hearing. See, Eakin Enterprises, Inc. v. Specialty Sales LLC
, 2012
WL 2445154, *10 (E.D. Cal. 2012) (denying without prejudice invalidity summary judgment motion filed concurrently with a motion to dismiss since the court had not yet construed the claims and the parties had not yet engaged in any discovery as “[n]ormally it is not advisable to proceed with the claim construction process until at least some substantive discovery has taken place”). Allowing claim construction proceedings to go forward will allow the parties to conduct claim construction discovery and allow e.Digital to provide expert witness testimony, if necessary, to testify as to, among other things, how a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand the amended claims and the additional reexamination history.
doni