SS Read it twice. Judge saw right through Apple's BS and lets them know it.
I guess now Apple's lawyers know they can't fool the Judge.
"Alternatively, a complaint may be dismissed where it presents
a cognizable legal theory, yet fails to plead essential facts under that theory"
"Furthermore, Defendant’s non-infringement arguments are rife with factual issues, which cannot be
decided on the pleadings, even as augmented by the PIC."
What's next?
