Re: if what we have is proven in march
in response to
by
posted on
Oct 03, 2013 09:07AM
RE: CO case item A
A. “flash memory” (Claims 1, 2 and 19 of the ‘774 Patent and Claim 5 of the ‘737 Patent)
e.Digital’s Proposed Construction: "block erasable non-volatile memory"
Defendants’ Proposed Construction: "block erasable non-volatile memory that is the main memory of the system "
The confidence that Handal has (as I) for the current claims construction of 737....(Claims 1, 2 and 19 of the ‘774 Patent) will not be part of the claims construction, or will the new 33 and 34 claims.
The only thing that can be considered..
What is flash memory?
A. “flash memory” Claim 5 of the ‘737 Patent)
The present defendants can not build the consideration of the previous defendants... based on claims 1 and 19
There is only one claim involved...5.....no separation...means a specific meaning of flash memory....and no bullshi*.
The defendants have that to think about along side of the negotiation that e.Digital is offering in settling prior to any court ruling.
Anyway..FWIW
doni