Free
Message: Re: Hmmm
10
Dec 21, 2013 03:09PM
1
Dec 21, 2013 03:44PM
14
Dec 21, 2013 04:00PM
6
Dec 21, 2013 04:15PM
2
Dec 21, 2013 05:04PM
1
Dec 21, 2013 05:15PM
10
Dec 21, 2013 09:10PM
4
Dec 21, 2013 09:31PM
6
Dec 21, 2013 09:35PM
7
Dec 21, 2013 09:39PM
3
Dec 21, 2013 09:44PM
5
Dec 21, 2013 10:17PM
3
Dec 21, 2013 10:24PM
6
Dec 21, 2013 11:55PM
8
Dec 22, 2013 12:08AM
6
Dec 22, 2013 08:40AM
4
Dec 22, 2013 08:58AM
2
Dec 22, 2013 09:08AM
6
Dec 22, 2013 10:38AM
13
Dec 22, 2013 10:56AM

Dec 22, 2013 11:05AM
3
Dec 22, 2013 11:07AM

Dec 22, 2013 11:22AM
6
Dec 22, 2013 11:27AM
3
Dec 22, 2013 11:34AM
8
Dec 22, 2013 11:40AM
2
Dec 22, 2013 11:41AM
7
Dec 22, 2013 11:57AM
3
Dec 22, 2013 12:30PM
6
Dec 22, 2013 12:51PM
4
Dec 22, 2013 01:16PM
4
Dec 22, 2013 01:32PM
8
Dec 22, 2013 01:38PM
2
Dec 22, 2013 01:41PM
8
Dec 22, 2013 01:49PM
6
Dec 22, 2013 01:57PM
2
Dec 22, 2013 01:57PM
7
Dec 22, 2013 02:05PM
14
Dec 22, 2013 02:39PM
4
Dec 22, 2013 04:02PM

Dec 22, 2013 04:24PM
1
Dec 22, 2013 06:13PM
2
Dec 22, 2013 07:04PM
3
Dec 22, 2013 07:59PM

Dec 22, 2013 08:14PM
9
Dec 22, 2013 10:59PM
6
Dec 23, 2013 08:59AM
1
Dec 23, 2013 09:09AM
1
Dec 23, 2013 09:57AM

"If we get a positive appeal, will 774/737/108 be back in play on Apple with the 'with prejudice' we just saw?"

Also, keep in mind ...108 was not part of Apples infringement claims....with that, it only settled on 774 ....

Unless e.Digital threw in 108 at the last minute.

The only signal I'm getting from the settlement....Apple, O'Shea.....get lost...

We'll see on the final court order what was dismissed and in what fashion.

And I don't care...for me it's Apple get lost.

doni

3
Dec 23, 2013 10:22AM
7
Dec 23, 2013 10:31AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply