Free
Message: Re: Hmmm
10
Dec 21, 2013 03:09PM
1
Dec 21, 2013 03:44PM
14
Dec 21, 2013 04:00PM
6
Dec 21, 2013 04:15PM
2
Dec 21, 2013 05:04PM
1
Dec 21, 2013 05:15PM
10
Dec 21, 2013 09:10PM
4
Dec 21, 2013 09:31PM
6
Dec 21, 2013 09:35PM
7
Dec 21, 2013 09:39PM
3
Dec 21, 2013 09:44PM
5
Dec 21, 2013 10:17PM
3
Dec 21, 2013 10:24PM
6
Dec 21, 2013 11:55PM
8
Dec 22, 2013 12:08AM
6
Dec 22, 2013 08:40AM
4
Dec 22, 2013 08:58AM
2
Dec 22, 2013 09:08AM
6
Dec 22, 2013 10:38AM
13
Dec 22, 2013 10:56AM

Dec 22, 2013 11:05AM
3
Dec 22, 2013 11:07AM

Dec 22, 2013 11:22AM
6
Dec 22, 2013 11:27AM
3
Dec 22, 2013 11:34AM
8
Dec 22, 2013 11:40AM
2
Dec 22, 2013 11:41AM
7
Dec 22, 2013 11:57AM
3
Dec 22, 2013 12:30PM
6
Dec 22, 2013 12:51PM
4
Dec 22, 2013 01:16PM
4
Dec 22, 2013 01:32PM
8
Dec 22, 2013 01:38PM
2
Dec 22, 2013 01:41PM
8
Dec 22, 2013 01:49PM
6
Dec 22, 2013 01:57PM
2
Dec 22, 2013 01:57PM
7
Dec 22, 2013 02:05PM
14
Dec 22, 2013 02:39PM
4
Dec 22, 2013 04:02PM

Dec 22, 2013 04:24PM
1
Dec 22, 2013 06:13PM
2
Dec 22, 2013 07:04PM
3
Dec 22, 2013 07:59PM

Dec 22, 2013 08:14PM
9
Dec 22, 2013 10:59PM
6
Dec 23, 2013 08:59AM
1
Dec 23, 2013 09:09AM
1
Dec 23, 2013 09:57AM
4
Dec 23, 2013 10:16AM
3
Dec 23, 2013 10:22AM

Here is Apples SPJ ...it's for 774 only....

09/30/2013 51 STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT. The Court enters this Stipulated Partial Judgment of Non-Infringement (a) in favor of Apple on e.Digital's claim for infringement of independent claims 33 and 34 and dependent claims 2, 10, 15 and 23 of the '774 patent and any other claims depending therefrom, and (b) in favor of Apple on Apple's Counterclaim Count V for non-infringement of independent claims 33 and 34 and dependent claims 2, 10, 15 and 23 of the 774 patent and any other claims depending therefrom. Apple hereby dismisses without prejudice its Counterclaim Count VI for invalidity of the 774 patent, as well as all other defenses with respect to the 774 patent, and reserves the right to re-assert all counterclaims and defenses relating to the 774 patent should e.Digital or any successor in interest accuse Apple of infringement of the 774 patent at any later point in time. This Stipulated Partial Judgment of Non-Infringement is without prejudice to the Parties rights to appeal the Court's Collateral Estoppel Order and/or any prior or future orders issued by the Court in this matter, and is without prejudice to any claim for attorneys fees and/or costs under any basis, including without limitation Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 and 54(d), and 35 U.S.C. ยง 285. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 9/30/2013.(aef) (jrl). (Entered: 10/01/2013)

Now we wait to see the ordered settlement.....it should be for 774 only.

Lets hope that is the only issue settled and 108 is still in play....

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply