Re: Pacer :e.DIGITAL v. Lite-On IT Corporation - willingness to discuss settlement !
posted on
Feb 08, 2014 08:02PM
I am not saying that I think that something is going to happen this month, just that all of these cases are being pushed into March and early at the behest of Edig not the request of the defendants. I believe that Doni's approximate time line for the CE appeal to be known is possibly the June/July period, not sure if anyone has mentioned fall or winter. Also, many here believe that the 108 was erroniously combined with 774 in the CE. This thing has to run its course as related to 774, but there is a possibility that, early on in the appeals process, the court will decide that 108 should not have been a part because it was not litigated in Colorado--just a possibility. This is how I understand it and why I posted what I did.
I am, by no means getting confident, just pointing out some facts regarding time lines and wondering if there could be a specific reason that Edig is asking for delays and the defendants have not yet answered. Wouldn't you think that they would want to hold the defendants feet to the fire and move this thing along as quickly as is possible?