Re: Patent # 108
in response to
by
posted on
Dec 05, 2014 02:04PM
See, I had read this before, it also has encasement/circuity-to-buttons then now a clear RAM distinction, but/however I always assumed it was an extention on coordination with 774; we thought they were all dependant on each other, but not so. They can be but not necessary to have to be.
ram/memory to
This CC will be interesting -
however, why did these last siuts only claim 1,5 of 108 - I see talk on claim 1.
ow-well, we know the whole 108 can now be used if called for, which will get us into aspects of 445 as well.
Apple should just buy us
e