Agoracom: Small Cap Investment - e.Digital - Re: e.Digital Corporation v. New Dane ~ Pending Settlement

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: e.Digital Corporation v. New Dane ~ Pending Settlement

in response to

Re: e.Digital Corporation v. New Dane ~ Pending Settlement

TJTOAD

posted on Dec 08, 2014 12:43PM

The "look back" for each patent is limited to 6 years based on this DD offered by others.

Point is, Flash-R revenue sources will eventually dry up. Might take a few years, but it's inevitable.

7 Recommendations

Re: Time limitation on damages

DISCHINO

Dec 08, 2014 12:43PM

Re: Time limitation on damages

Black Labs Rule

Dec 08, 2014 01:06PM

Re: e.Digital Corporation v. New Dane ~ Pending Settlement

emit

Dec 08, 2014 07:48PM

Re: e.Digital Corporation v. New Dane ~ Pending Settlement

Black Labs Rule

Dec 08, 2014 08:40PM

Re: e.Digital Corporation v. New Dane ~ Pending Settlement

Giants

Dec 08, 2014 08:52PM

Re: e.Digital Corporation v. New Dane ~ Pending Settlement

doni

Dec 09, 2014 08:28AM

In regard to EDIG v. Apple only #170,737 &774 are dismissed. Patent 108 is alive

sman998

Dec 09, 2014 10:51AM

Re e.DIGITAL v. Apple settlement

sman998

Dec 09, 2014 11:40AM

Re: e.Digital Corporation v. New Dane ~ Pending Settlement

doni

Dec 09, 2014 12:30PM

Re: In regard to EDIG v. Apple only #170,737 &774 are dismissed. Patent 108 is alive

doni

Dec 09, 2014 12:43PM

Re: In regard to EDIG v. Apple only #170,737 &774 are dismissed. Patent 108 is alive

sman998

Dec 09, 2014 12:47PM

Re: e.Digital Corporation v. New Dane ~ Pending Settlement

doni

Dec 09, 2014 12:51PM

Re: In regard to EDIG v. Apple only #170,737 &774 are dismissed. Patent 108 is alive

doni

Dec 09, 2014 01:21PM

Re: In regard to EDIG v. Apple only #170,737 &774 are dismissed. Patent 108 is alive

koala

Dec 09, 2014 01:32PM

Re: In regard to EDIG v. Apple only #170,737 &774 are dismissed. Patent 108 is alive

doni

Dec 09, 2014 01:37PM

Re: In regard to EDIG v. Apple only #170,737 &774 are dismissed. Patent 108 is alive