Free
Message: Re: In regard to EDIG v. Apple only #170,737 &774 are dismissed. Patent 108 is alive
14
Dec 08, 2014 12:37PM
3
Dec 08, 2014 12:43PM
13
Dec 09, 2014 11:40AM

Jef , Agree for your comment . The bulk of Handal strategy hidden in these paragraphs from Pacer.

As argued below, Apple’s “Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Rule 12(c)” is without merit. The Motion amounts to little more than a strategic attempt to force e.Digital to prematurely disclose its claim construction positions well before it has had a chance to conduct discovery or review Apple’s invalidity contentions. Indeed, the bulk of Apple’s Motion depends entirely on how the Court will ultimately construe certain key claim terms after the Markman hearing scheduled in March 2014.
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply