Free
Message: Re: In regard to EDIG v. Apple only #170,737 &774 are dismissed. Patent 108 is alive
14
Dec 08, 2014 12:37PM
3
Dec 08, 2014 12:43PM
13
Dec 09, 2014 11:40AM

"Getting a license for the whole portfolio."

We have no idea if licensing is taking place, at all, for any of the defendants...If it is, the licenses are for 774 only, based on the merits of the CO ruling. A particular memory type not needing RAM, the licenses will be based on that....as that is all e.Digital had to offer.

Do you feel e.Digital would give 108 to Apple while it was under appeal? An appeal of CE that was perpetrated by Apple?.....lol

e.Digital was not obligated to venture 108 to Apple while it was being prosecuted under appeal. Apple settled prior to the outcome of the appeal.

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply