sman...that points to my considerations of defendants making known early on in their judicial proceedings for a review process.

The two can function in parallel without the judicial proceedings needing a stay.

At some point in time they merge and can then be hammered out, with or without a short stay to conclude.

If defendants want to go the route of initiating a petition for review, as Intel did and Mircon is attempting, or at this point threatening as Micron has not filed with the USPTO, there now exists positive claims construction results that benefit e.Digital in front of the review.

What are the consequences of defendants that take that route where the review is then found to be positive for e.Digital?

doni