Free
Message: Re: Handal (back up counsel) for IPR- Google v. EDIG
2
Nov 22, 2015 07:16PM
3
Nov 22, 2015 09:27PM
2
Nov 22, 2015 10:15PM
6
Nov 23, 2015 09:46AM
4
Nov 23, 2015 10:35AM
4
Nov 23, 2015 10:43AM

Nov 23, 2015 10:53AM
4
Nov 23, 2015 10:56AM
6
Nov 23, 2015 11:04AM
3
Nov 23, 2015 11:09AM
8
Nov 23, 2015 11:18AM
2
vic
Nov 23, 2015 11:29AM
2
Nov 23, 2015 11:40AM
12
Nov 23, 2015 11:44AM
4
Nov 23, 2015 11:53AM
13
Nov 23, 2015 12:04PM
4
Nov 23, 2015 12:58PM
2
Nov 23, 2015 01:25PM
4
Nov 23, 2015 01:51PM
9
Nov 23, 2015 02:28PM

Nov 23, 2015 03:07PM
3
Nov 24, 2015 08:39AM
4
Nov 24, 2015 09:08AM
1
Nov 24, 2015 09:20AM
14
vic
Nov 24, 2015 10:10AM
2
Nov 24, 2015 10:35AM
6
Nov 24, 2015 10:36AM
7
Nov 24, 2015 11:03AM
4
vic
Nov 24, 2015 11:19AM
11
Nov 24, 2015 11:24AM
4
Nov 24, 2015 11:40AM
10
Nov 24, 2015 12:47PM
9
Nov 24, 2015 02:21PM
8
Nov 27, 2015 09:21AM
4
Nov 27, 2015 09:55AM
5
vic
Nov 27, 2015 11:20AM

I've considered exactly what you consider...why so long to make that decision?

They could simply rule conditionally if he was to be allowed as motioned....where if they were not going to allow his motion ...simply kill it now.

IMO, Can't hang much on it....but it does seem strange not to rule on a procedural issue, as it has nothing to do with the petition in any direct way.

Looks to be a secret until the day the petition is decided.

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply