"The attempt at filing a patent is 12/680492 received final rejection and was abandoned. Would you not be able to call into question any of the claims set forth in the provisional?"
Opty...Thanks for following my process.....you do see the inconsistency of the Miluzzo USPTO relationship.
Application type provisional 60/976,371....filed 09-28-2007.... Expired...... 10-5-2008...never filed a nonprovisional to preserve the early filing date...see reference below.
Application type utility 12/680,492.............filed 08-09-2010 (3 years after provisional see reference below) abandoned... 12-1-2014
| 12-03-2014 |
Mail Abandonment for Failure to Respond to Office Action |
| 05-09-2014 |
Mail Final Rejection (PTOL - 326) |
| 05-05-2014 |
Final Rejection |
Thanks for following my process.....you do see the inconsistency of the Miluzzo USPTO relationship.
It's plain to see that they dropped the ball on a final rejection.....and did not clear up the inconsistency to meet any patent-ability status.
The 492 (apparently junk) abandoned filed on the principles of the early filing of 371 now Expired
IMVHO, it is questionable issue between the two.
With that, 371 is now part of a PCT US filing that is now 8 years dormant in USPTO proceedings....371 is our direct Prior art hump regarding the WO patent issues.....That, because of an early filing date....Where, apparently, it's not a problem to have inconsistency on the world stage.
Anyway, food for thought.
doni
