Did you know?
You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)
Re: Snippet ( 6) - Inter Parte Review - Patent owner response-DONI
Interesting that 12/680492 required that claims be withdrawn and new claims written. Most of new claims were directed to invention not tied to specification and hence cancelled by examiner and remaining claims were found to be anticipated.
So, in the case of Miluzzo, USPTO is using prior art that was unable to be patented and was anticipated itself. How valid can any of Miluzzo's teachings be?
