Where for that...

during his attempt to recover 774 issues he ran head on into a very disagreeable judge that would not recognize the recently completed re-exam of 774....that amounted to a disagreeable ruling of 774 while combining the innocence of 108 to it.

He then had to unwind that judges nasty attitude for the independence of 108.

At the conclusion of that appeal he ran head on into AIA which diluted the same issues he worked so very, very hard to establish.

He's run head on into AIA over NUNCHI issues, though better prepared to take on the issues.

Now that it appears he has established a standing presence for NUNCHI in both theaters of "due process".....He runs head on into a complete revamp of 76 yrs, or there about, of Fed statute.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) vs. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570, 167 L. Ed. 2d 929 (2007)

Amazing chain of events....

doni