Free
Message: Re: now that we are past - doni
6
Jul 12, 2016 11:32AM
2
Jul 12, 2016 01:06PM

Jul 12, 2016 07:24PM
4
Jul 13, 2016 02:24PM
2
Jul 13, 2016 02:38PM
5
Jul 13, 2016 05:42PM

"It seems to me that this procedural issue is very important to Handal/lawyers."

I'd say so....lol

"Has the Court (Jon Tiger's) ruled on that matter?"

NO

They're @ this state...

Full docket text for document 47:
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Hon. Jon S. Tigar: Motion Hearing held on 7/7/2016 re [23] First MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by iBaby Labs, Inc. FTR Recording Time 2:33 - 3:03 p.m. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 7/7/2016)

The Judge heard the arguments, he will rule shortly...defendant asked for audio recordings of the hearing on the 10th...

The defendant motioned for the original complaint to be dismissed 1-28-2016...the motion terminated ...2-10-2016

e.Digital then amended the complaint, where defendant has subsequently motioned to dismiss this first amended complaint on the same grounds.

They been tossing this argument around since 1-28-2016.

Will the judge simply rule e.Digital complied on amendment...and supplementals...

???

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply