Free
Message: Re: FYI !
10
Jul 31, 2017 02:57PM
9
Jul 31, 2017 03:02PM
2
Jul 31, 2017 03:43PM
2
Jul 31, 2017 08:50PM
2
Aug 01, 2017 08:38AM
1
Aug 01, 2017 08:43AM

Aug 02, 2017 05:41AM

Aug 02, 2017 06:38AM
16
Aug 02, 2017 10:27AM
6
Aug 02, 2017 11:21AM
7
Aug 02, 2017 11:54AM
4
Aug 02, 2017 12:00PM
2
Aug 02, 2017 02:17PM

Thank you sman998,  I used you information to send letter to both trustees.  See response I recived.  

Any thoughts???

 

Hello Sir, 
 
Thank you for your email.  Did you actually review the bankruptcy schedules filed in the case?  Patents were disclosed.  I do not understand the basis for the assertion that they were not disclosed.  Please explain.
 
Regards,
 
Christopher R. Barclay
Chapter 7 Trustee
 
--------- Original Message ---------
Subject: Trustee for e.Digital Corporation, a Delaware corporation: (db) casbke 3:17-bk-04075.
From: Me
Date: 8/2/17 8:29 am
To: "admin@crb7trustee.com" <admin@crb7trustee.com>

 Hello and good day Mr. Christopher Barclay,

I am a long term shareholder of e.Digital Corporation and found you are the appointed trustee for the bankruptcy filing of company e.Digital Corporation, a Delaware corporation: (db) casbke 3:17-bk-04075. ch7  07/06/2017. 

I am contacting you by email because as a shareholder of e.Digital Corporation I find this chapter 7 bankruptcy filing to be illegal and fraudulent.  The reasons I suspect fraud was committed are as follows:

  1. Company has no significant debt
  2. Lack of Considering Patents in chapter 7 filing
  3. Very optimistic forward looking comments in latest Press Releases.

Additionally, due to this chapter 7 bankruptcy filing I ask you to research the settlement for the case between Google v. e.DIGITAL settlement and license agreement from June 2016.  As a shareholder I would like to know the details of this settlement and license agreement.


And finally, I find very strange and suspicious that Mary Fales Patent Attorney withdrew right before the Chapter 7 filling. This should be investigated, because one of the reason she quit was "A client insists upon taking action that the practitioner considers Repugnant or with which the practitioner has a fundamental disagreement".


Thanking you in advance for your consideration.


Best regards,  Me

1
Aug 02, 2017 03:15PM
6
Aug 02, 2017 04:12PM
2
Aug 02, 2017 06:14PM
11
Aug 02, 2017 06:42PM
6
Aug 02, 2017 07:06PM

Aug 02, 2017 07:07PM
4
Aug 02, 2017 07:20PM

Aug 03, 2017 10:03AM
4
Aug 03, 2017 12:36PM

Aug 03, 2017 12:50PM
5
Aug 03, 2017 10:10PM
5
Aug 07, 2017 04:24PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply