Thanks. I remain concerned that as the various geo-analytical advances "continue apace" you will be endlessly seeking further and further refinement of targets. And if you keep chasing a moving target, the result will be, as it has been, no drilling at all. It's hard to imagine potential funders demanding the same degree of precision as JB. This is mineral exploration, after all. It's a risky enterprise. Deals do get done w/o absolute certainty. Wouldn't increasing the range of holes that could be funded today more than compensate for the more "precise" someday holes that may never get drilled at all?