irr, good to see you have just joined us on this forum.

Not to be ignorant, but I thought my post was pretty clear.

The talk about the drill results was meant to say, they are what they are at this time. Partial, incomplete and initial. Lori has told us that and in no way am I implying any incompetence on the companies part for them being what they are. I have questioned the company and they said any material info on hand had to be put out at that time.Its my understanding that it was requested by the exchange and they had to comply, whether material on hand at the time was bad, mediocre or good. Just our bad luck that the info was incomplete.

I honestly can,t see why we would be sitting on bad results. We have already mined down to 100m on this property with average grades that exceed the richest mine in Canada, if not North America. The geophysics suggests that there are many new surprises to be found on this property, so the trenching has to be good, IMO. For ex; one test of the geophysics helped the geo to go to a part of the property that was paid little attention to, because previous sampling only revealed an average grade of somewhere around 8 g/t. What happened, because of the geophysics, a new vein was found in this area that produced 2.5 ozs or approx 70 g/t gold from one sample taken from a nine foot hole, 18 inches in diameter, to find the geophysical target.

So, its little clues like this that suggest the reason for results being held back, are for good reasons, IMO.

IMO