Jeff,

There you go playing the victim card again. LOL

This is a situation of our partner not delivering on promises and of Paul taking the very proactive leadership position of foreclosing to protect assets and the investors' interest.

Do I wish this had not been necessary? Sure. But this was a very strong move on Paul's part and we should end up with 100% of the company instead of only 50%.

I know some sarchastic victim-minded reader will come back with the retort that "100% of nothing is still nothing", so I will save him the trouble.

There is still an active sales and marketing program, there are still assets of roughly $1M or so, there is a patent and there are sales. I know that the sales are insufficient to satisfy those who revel in their victimhood, but there are sales none the less, and sales have continued to increase. Trials are still on-going, and some of them are with the largest poultry producers in the world.

I don't see how anything has changed from a week ago other than that our interest is moving from 50% to 100%. That seems like a good thing from where I sit.

-zties