Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Sooner than later
1
Jun 07, 2012 10:24AM
5
Jun 07, 2012 10:30AM
1
Jun 07, 2012 10:46AM
3
Jun 07, 2012 10:59AM
3
Jun 07, 2012 11:17AM

Jun 07, 2012 11:30AM

Jun 07, 2012 11:35AM
1
Jun 07, 2012 11:38AM

Jun 07, 2012 11:43AM

Jun 07, 2012 11:48AM
14
Jun 07, 2012 12:09PM
4
Jun 07, 2012 12:14PM
1
Jun 07, 2012 12:32PM
4
Jun 07, 2012 12:50PM
18
Jun 07, 2012 01:01PM
7
Jun 07, 2012 01:04PM
4
Jun 07, 2012 01:08PM
23
Jun 07, 2012 01:19PM

My 2 scenarios:

1) If Teck wanted to go at this alone they should buy us before the Feasibility is released.

2) If Teck intends to have a partner involved (big minor), that player will want to see the Feasibility before commiting and know what they're buying, thus CUU must have a clean slate.

Problem is Teck would not want this partner to get the voting shares or speacial clauses or land.

Since the Teck-CUU agreement is so complicated (Land, Liard shares, 4 year clause, financing, etc) Teck and CUU must first form a new agreement. (this is what I believe they've been doing for the last 6 months).

In this case Teck should back in before Feasibility is released. Parallel to this or before the back in the JV terms are formed with CUU as well as a new agreement (as we speak). This give CUU a clean slate, ready to be sold. Because at that point you know what they have and what they don't have.

(this is why we're seeing the new land grabbing each month, new maps updated and specific claim numbers)

Then the Feasibility is released (giving Teck and CUU a nice boost)

Once Feasibility released, Teck brings in the new partner and CUU is ready to be sold (as all the Teck-CUU details have been taken care of).

In this scenario expect Teck to back in before Feasibility.

Teck doesn't want to trigger that 4 year clause or expenditure so before they back in the new agreement and terms must be made...and that is what I think has been going on for the last 6 months....(since the dat Emer was invited by Teck to the Liard board, that was the signal for negotiation)

15
Jun 07, 2012 01:35PM
4
Jun 07, 2012 01:39PM
10
Jun 07, 2012 01:39PM
3
Jun 07, 2012 01:40PM
9
Jun 07, 2012 01:46PM
4
Jun 07, 2012 01:50PM
11
Jun 07, 2012 02:11PM
4
Jun 07, 2012 09:13PM
23
Jun 07, 2012 10:31PM
4
Jun 07, 2012 11:12PM
2
Jun 08, 2012 10:25AM

Jun 08, 2012 11:53AM
2
Jun 08, 2012 12:00PM
1
Jun 08, 2012 12:16PM
2
Jun 08, 2012 12:28PM

Jun 08, 2012 12:30PM

Jun 08, 2012 12:33PM

Jun 08, 2012 12:37PM
5
Jun 08, 2012 12:43PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply