Agoracom: Small Cap Investment - Copper Fox Metals Inc.

Jul 31, 2014 01:19PM

Prospekt

Jul 31, 2014 01:29PM

Prospekt

Jul 31, 2014 01:38PM

Jul 31, 2014 01:46PM

Jul 31, 2014 01:52PM

Jul 31, 2014 01:59PM

Jul 31, 2014 02:04PM

Jul 31, 2014 02:05PM

Russ Reid

Jul 31, 2014 02:06PM

Jul 31, 2014 02:08PM

Jul 31, 2014 02:11PM

Jul 31, 2014 02:15PM

Jul 31, 2014 02:23PM

Jul 31, 2014 02:27PM

bigbuck

Jul 31, 2014 03:53PM

Russ Reid

Jul 31, 2014 05:16PM

Jul 31, 2014 10:47PM

Jul 31, 2014 11:03PM

Jul 31, 2014 11:19PM

Aug 01, 2014 12:09AM

Orcinus

Aug 01, 2014 03:00AM

simc1

Aug 01, 2014 07:56AM

deeppocket83

Aug 01, 2014 10:16AM

Aug 01, 2014 11:05AM

YourNadir

Aug 01, 2014 02:22PM

koperfoks

Aug 01, 2014 04:04PM

calvin123456789

Aug 01, 2014 06:32PM

Aug 08, 2014 08:59PM

Prospekt

Rank: President [?]

Points: 25043 [?]

Votes: 175 Score: 4.1 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: Leftholdingthebag.

in response to

posted on Aug 08, 2014 09:21PM

I agree with everything you said.

The sensitivity of the waterways are a concern.

Tailings facilities are not exempt from breach.

New construction specifications will be given a hard look over for new projects.

The thing is...this is not anything new or different in light of the Mount Polley experience. It is just basic common-sense and the way things have always been.

What will be different is when they find out what actually happened at Mount Polley and see if it is applicable to the Schaft Creek mine environmental assessment.

Personally I think they are going to find that Imperial Metals exceeded their specifications, and that monitoring was not good enough. Or at least enforcement was not good enough.

7 Recommendations

Aug 08, 2014 09:34PM

Prospekt

Aug 08, 2014 10:26PM

Aug 08, 2014 11:25PM