Re: Here is what I think :) My 2 Cents :)
in response to
by
posted on
Apr 15, 2016 11:20AM
CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)
Hello
The Mineral Tenure Act is very clear. It was good to refresh my old prospector memory. My original comment was that the remining lapsed claims within the lapsed footprint are " Not Available " This is for a reason, be it Procedural ? or Related to the issue ?
The Mineral Tenure Act is very clear. You Snooze zzzzzzzzzzz You Lose zzzzzzzzzzzzz
The Amalgamation Date set to the earliest claim I was not aware of. They had lots of assessment work credits and could easily have moved the Forfeit Date. Alternatively not merged the cells, as why lose assessment work credits.
Nowara