Re: Rule #7, Amendment to rule #2
in response to
by
posted on
Jul 19, 2012 02:12PM
Member Inquiries, Feedback and Testimonials
Society beats conformity into the people or it banishes them when that fails. Look at the heat I'm taking. I've seen the shift in mentallity and ignored it. There's clearly a bulge in the middle who show themselves through what they rate as good. The more britteny spear fashion'esk crap the better. I had taken this originally as an attack from the outside. It appears to be an attempt to mask what's good with highly rated garbage. The top post of all time is Nadir. It's a diatribe against me. A person who reads this learns nothing about the company. Is Nadir becoming a problem. Should he be banned to preserve the stock board nature of the site? Nadir, you're not contributing you're just attacking what you don't like in a snyde sycophantic way to the masses. The stock did indeed go down but you lied about it. And yes, omission to press a false point is a lie.
Foxy doesn't contribute about the stock but has been very dilligent at rooting out bashers. I've said this before, she does tend to need to be reeled in from time to time. If we ban her for harrassment then harassment needs to be defined in a very clear structure otherwise the people who are attcking me recently could be construed to be harassing. Was and are nadir's belittling condecending (arogant Trontonian like) tantrums against me harassment? (This last part is just a little taste of your own.) If these attacks are not harassement then the general buldge likes their boot lickers and who are we to say they can't have it that way?