I think the difference however is that by and large with Web the "harassment" is done in more of a debate style. Foxy is just out and out accusatory with absolutely 0 evidence. In Webs case the evidence would count as opinion. Although there have been some cheap shots there. Ive had plenty of my posts hacked away at, or my opinions, but I have basically chalked them up to counter opinions as I believe everybody has one.

Foxy is a different story...she exhibits baseless attacks against a multitude of posters, and from what Ive seen just being a new poster was often enough to warrant her attention. Let it also not be said that Foxy was warned a multitude of times regarding this and chose to ignore it. I believe she does need to take responsibility for this.

One of the other things Foxy did was PM people with her accusations, and while I know every poster can be thrown in the hot seat due to opinion, very few of these counter opinions could qualify as slander.

Like I said...I see Foxys point about not breaking any rules..at least publically...but I also see the tide turned heavily against her. Lets face it...people by and large are obviously sick of her.

Im not above giving her a second chance.....but I think it should be contingent on a zero tolerance policy as her history speaks for itself, and I think she should apologize to some of the posters on this board publically.

My .02.

Rogue,