I agree that there are serious polution issues that need to be dealt with, but I disagree completely with the entire concept that humans are contributing to climate change through carbon emissions. And therefore I think all of the rhetoric about becoming carbon neutral is nonsense, a distraction, a waste of time and resources that could be diverted towards real issues that actually are important.

The 'science' behind global warming has always been full of holes. No one can come up with a model that works, to explain how the climate is behaving. Thats the most basic concept towards defining the situation. If this climate change is driven by man and can be narrowed down to greenhouse gases, then why is it that not one working climate model has been created that predicts the behaviour of the climate, and can be back tested with prior data? And if we cannot even demonstrate that we know how our climate is behaving, then how can people state that people are the cause of the climate change, and that it can be reversed by human action?

Instead what we have been handed is a massaged data base that is plugged into a simplistic model with a predetermined outcome to show exactly what the warmists want to show. Year after year, the numbers and predictions are changed. Compare what we were told 10 years ago to what has actually been happening. The models are flawed.

If a major pharma company wanted to produce a wonderful new drug, and they were found to be guilty of tampering with the testing data, taking out numbers that did not make their drug look good, inventing other numbers, hiding proof that the drug was not working as they promised it would.... does anyone believe that would be just brushed off as no big deal and it would be launched and promoted as the safe drug nonetheless? I doubt it. Yet that is exactly what is happening right now with the warmists and the revelations that they have been lying to the public for years, fine tuning the raw data to create the scenario they wish to present, attacking those who disagree with them, and preventing the scientific process from functioning.

Look, if the science was real, wouldn't the people involved want to have as many people as possible review the data and prove their conclusions through repetition? Why this campaign to attack and marginalize anyone that disagrees? This is NOT science folks, its propaganda, an attempt to ram a major social change down the throat of well-meaning people that believe they are doing the right thing. It will cost us hundreds of billions of dollars, transfered in grimy deals to poor countries where corruption is part of doing business.

I want no part of this scam. I hope enough people wake up to what is going on in time to put a stop to this nonsense. There are liars and criminals that have been abusing the good faith that we put into research and science to hyjack the environmental movement, and I fear they will do a lot of damage before this whole episode winds down.

And I know I will be attacked for my comments, since that his how people respond when their beliefs are challenged. You cannot go through life as a mindless idiot and just accept what other people want you to think. You have a responsibility to investigate and determine if the agenda is real and the science is legitimate. Those who think they love the planet more because they refuse to question the popular myth are a big part of the problem.

cheers!

mike