have we figured out whether ALL of NEC has settled, or whether some portions of that corporation are holding out (which defies logic)? It's been posted that NEC Electronics America is a subsidiary of NEC Electronics Corporation.  As such, it seems they're under the same umbrella and therefore wouldn't necessarily have to be cited as a descrete entitiy.

Also, lots of posts re: "with prejudice" and "without prejudice".  I'm afraid I'm not clear on the significance.  In the NEC settlement Pacer filing, our claims are dismissed with prejudice.  NEC's counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice.  But with our claims dismissed with prejudice, aren't any counterclaims in the action moot?

Clarity on these two things would be helpful.  I suspect this lack of clarity and associated confusion may be a part of why our PPS languishes.  That plus my hopeful thoughts re: S&L continuing to unload shares to enable warrant conversions.

TIA for any help. I obviously KNOW nuttin'!

SGE