Thank you again for your efforts.

There is one thing I don't understand, and for which I could use some clarification from you. You keep saying that the USPTO re-exam activities will drive the Js to "sign on the dotted line". Since the USPTO info you're providing all has to do with the '584, what "dotted line" are you talking about? The instant litigation no longer includes the '584. IMO, the stay has nothing to do with the'584, but with the '148 and '336 only (and IMO was prompted by JW ruling in private on the ACP issue).

Is your opinion re: the '584 and the Js signing on the dotted line have to do with Milestone's opinion that the ultimate settlement will include a license with the Js for the entire MMP, including the '584?

Your continued ascertions that the fine info you've gathered and shared re: the '584 caused the stay (even thought the '584 is no longer part of the case) and will further cause the Js to sign - presumeably - a settlement just has me baffled as to how to reach that conclusion, or how the '584 fits in.

Please help me understand where you're coming from, because I simply don't get it.

TIA, and again, thank you for your effort, as I can absolutely see where our success on the '584 with USPTO will be a major asset down stream, at a later date.

SGE